Legal Opinion
Kilbride Invs. Ltd. v. Cushman & Wakefield of Pa., Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 16, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 13–5195PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuBois, District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
This is a fraud case in which Kilbride Investments Limited, Busystore Limited, and Bergfeld Co. Limited (collectively, "plaintiffs"), allege that defendants, Cushman & Wakefield of Pennsylvania, Inc. ("C & W"), Blank Rome LLP ("Blank Rome"), and Cozen O'Conner, P.C. ("Cozen"),1 induced them into investing at least $27 million in a real-estate development project called "River City," in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, by fraudulently misrepresenting the applicable zoning restrictions, the feasibility of the project, and the valuation of the real estate.
Before the Court are two…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ziglar v. AbbasiSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- DIXON v. SCHWEIZERDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- HEDDEN v. NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNIONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- LAPENSOHN v. HUDSON CITY SAVINGS BANKDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Marion, D. v. Bryn Mawr Trust Co., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- O'SHAUGHNESSY v. PALAZZODistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.