Legal Opinion

CIOCCA v. HEIDRICK & STRUGGLES, INC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 1, 2020No. 2:17-cv-05222Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MARY CIOCCA : : CIVIL ACTION v. : : NO. 17-5222 HEIDRICK & STRUGGLES, INC. : MEMORANDUM SURRICK, J. APRIL 1, 2020 Presently before the Court in this employment discrimination matter is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 38.) For the following reasons, Defendant’s Motion will be granted in part and denied in part. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Decision Strategies International (“DSI”), a consulting firm, hired Plaintiff Mary Ciocca as its office administrator in June of 2011. (June 28, 2018 Deposition of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API