Legal Opinion
Milam v. Milam
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 7, 1919No. 10537PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Error from District Court, Haskell County; W. H. Brown, Judge. Action by C. B. Milam against May Milam for divorce. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Per curiam
It appears on motion to dismiss this action that plaintiff in error failed to commence proceedings in this court within four months from the date of the decree appealed from as required by section 4971, Rev. Laws 1910. The motion to dismiss the appeal must be sustained. Linkugel v. Linkugel, 74 Oklahoma, 183 Pac. 55; Callahan v. Callahan, 47 Okla. 542, 149 Pac. 135.
It is so ordered.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Linkugel v. LinkugelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Callahan v. CallahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
3Cited by10 opinions
- O'Farrell v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Salt Lake City Corp. v. Jordan River Restoration NetworkUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Oven v. AusleySupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- City of Bartlesville v. KeelerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Reynolds v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.