Reynolds v. Reynolds
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RAY, C.
■ We think the motion to dismiss the appeal should be sustained. The plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, sued for divorce and alimony, for a division of the property, custody of the minor children, suit money and attorney’s fee. The defendant filed a cross-petition for divorce. The court made findings of fact and conclusions of law which were filed September 9,1921, and which concluded as follows:
“The defendant is better able to take care of the minor children than the plaintiff, and-is awarded the care, custody and control of them. He is also granted a divorce, but will be…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ex Parte Crow DogSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Montgomery v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Goodson v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- Howell v. HowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Murray v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Allred v. AllredSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- McLean v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
- Finnell v. FinnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Rorex v. KarcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.