Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 2, 1923No. 12986PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RAY, C.

■ We think the motion to dismiss the appeal should be sustained. The plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, sued for divorce and alimony, for a division of the property, custody of the minor children, suit money and attorney’s fee. The defendant filed a cross-petition for divorce. The court made findings of fact and conclusions of law which were filed September 9,1921, and which concluded as follows:

“The defendant is better able to take care of the minor children than the plaintiff, and-is awarded the care, custody and control of them. He is also granted a divorce, but will be…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Crow DogSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Montgomery v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Goodson v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  5. Howell v. HowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Murray v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Allred v. AllredSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. McLean v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Finnell v. FinnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Rorex v. KarcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API