City of Bartlesville v. Keeler
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtBranson, J.
This action grows out of a sewer contract made by the city officials of rhe city of Bartlesville, Okla., in January, 1921. The questions of law urged as growing out of the record, both by the plaintiffs and the defendants, are not without difficulty, but we think that most of the questions raised by the pleadings, and presented by Ihe record, are solved by rules established by this court.
The city of Bartlesville prosecutes this appeal. The city is joined, however, in the appeal by the contractors who built the sewer in sewer district No. 13 of said city, and whose contract compensation…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- County of Mobile v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Hancock v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Harrington v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Bragdon v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- White v. City of PawhuskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Besack v. City of BeatriceNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
- Boswell v. ChamblessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.