Edward Peruta v. County of San Diego
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
We must rule on motions to intervene in this Second Amendment case which were filed after our opinion and judgment reversing the District Court were filed.
*572When Sheriff William D. Gore declined to file a petition for rehearing en banc in this case, the State of California and the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence moved to intervene under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24. The California Police Chiefs’ Association (CPCA) and the California Peace Officers’ Association (CPOA), amici in this case, submitted a petition for rehearing en banc. However, amici cannot file petitions for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Carroll v. NakataniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Alisal Water Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. City of CarrolltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Edward Peruta v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Gould v. O'LearyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- (PC) Atkins v. RiosDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Anderson v. Municipality of AnchorageDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2023
- Hernandez v. Pennsylvania Tool Sales & Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.