Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Municipality of Anchorage

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided April 13, 2023No. 3:21-cv-00139Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA ROBERT ANDERSON, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:21-cv-00139-JMK vs. ORDER DENYING WITHOUT MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE, PREJUDICE MOTION TO CERTIFY Defendant. Before the Court at Docket 37 is Plaintiff Robert Anderson’s motion entitled “Fed.R.Civ.P 5.1(b) Constitutional Question.” Defendant Municipality of Anchorage (the “Municipality”) opposes the motion at Docket 40. Mr. Anderson did not file a reply. For the reasons stated below, the motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Mr. Anderson moves this Court to certify to the Alaska Attorney General…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. City of CarrolltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Edward Peruta v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Rodriguez v. Providence Community Corrections, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2016
  5. Edward Peruta v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API