Legal Opinion
(PC) Atkins v. Rios
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 4, 2022No. 1:20-cv-00193Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MCKINLEY PIERCE ATKINS, Case No. 1:20-cv-00193-ADA-CDB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR STAY AND FOR THE 13 v. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL 14 E. RIOS, et al., (Doc. 56) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff McKinley Pierce Atkins is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 18 rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 20 On September 15, 2022, the previously assigned magistrate judge issued Findings and 21 Recommendations to Grant…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Frederick C. Wilborn v. Antonio Escalderon and Ruth RushenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D. William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.