Legal Opinion

Crozier v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 28, 2012No. Civil Action Nos. 12-0008 (JBS/KMW), 12-0010 (JBS/KMW)PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SIMANDLE, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs Bridget Crozier and Marguerite McNamee have brought these putative class actions alleging that Defendant Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies Inc. has violated the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, N.J.S.A. § 56:8-1, et seq, as well as the implied warranties of merchantability under N.J.S.A. § 12A:2-314, and of fitness under N.J. Stat. Ann. § 12A:2-314, in connection with the sale of Neosporin NEO TO GO! first aid antiseptic/pain relieving spray.

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motions to Dismiss [Civ. No. 12-0008, Docket…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Goldemberg v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  2. Argabright v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
  3. Dzielak v. Whirlpool Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
  4. Mladenov v. Wegmans Food Markets, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
  5. Kuzian v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2013

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API