Eclipse Manufacturing Co. v. M & M Rental Center, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ELAINE E. BUCKLO, District Judge.
Before me is a motion by Robert Hin-man (“Hinman”) and Italia Foods, Inc. (“Italia Foods”) for leave to file a second amended class action complaint naming them as plaintiffs. Defendant M and M Rental Center, Inc. (“M and M”) previously filed a Rule 37 motion to dismiss Eclipse Manufacturing Co.’s (“Eclipse”) complaint or to strike plaintiffs answers to discovery. In its motion M and M contended that Hinman and not Eclipse was actually prosecuting the present claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, 47 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Valley Forge Insurance v. Swiderski Electronics, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Terrell Walters and Joseph Ganci, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. James EdgarCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Sound of Music Co. v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- American States Insurance Company v. Capital Associates of Jackson County, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hinman v. M and M Rental Center, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
- Hinman v. M and M Rental Center, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- Maxum Indemnity Co. v. Eclipse Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- U.S. Fax Law Center, Inc. v. T2 Technologies, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Italia Foods, Inc. v. Sun Tours, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.