Legal Opinion
Hinman v. M and M Rental Center, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 7, 2008No. 06 C 1156PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ELAINE E. BUCKLO, District Judge.
Robert Hinman and Italia Foods, Inc., 1 filed a class action against M and M Rental Center, Inc., alleging that M and M violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (the “TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227. Plaintiffs have moved to certify a class defined as
All persons who (1) on or after four years prior to the filing of this action, (2) were sent telephone facsimile messages of material advertising the commercial availability of any property, goods, or services by or on behalf of Defendant, and (3) with respect to whom Defendant cannot…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- John D. Szabo, Doing Business as Zatron v. Bridgeport MacHines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Pedro De La Fuente v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., Marcelino Vasquez and Albert Solis, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Retired Chicago Police Ass'n v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Gene and Gene LLC v. BIOPAY LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Landsman & Funk PC v. Skinder-Strauss AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Buonomo v. Optimum Outcomes, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- Manno v. Healthcare Revenue Recovery Group, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
- Wolfkiel v. Intersections Insurance Services Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.