Legal Opinion
Hinman v. M and M Rental Center, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 27, 2009No. 06 C 1156PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ELAINE E. BUCKLO, District Judge.
Robert Hinman and Italia Foods, Inc., represent a class of individuals in an action against M and M Rental Center, Inc., in which plaintiffs claim that M and M violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227, by sending them one or more unsolicited advertisements by fax. The plaintiff class, as defined in my order of April 7, 2008, Hinman v. M and M Rental Center, Inc., 545 F.Supp.2d 802, 808 (N.D.Ill.2008), is composed of:
All persons who, on or after four years prior to the filing of this action, were sent,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Daryl L. Johnson v. Cambridge Industries, Incorporated and Meridian Automotive Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Palm Beach Golf Center-Boca, Inc. v. John G. Sarris, D.D.S., P.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- City Select Auto Sales, Inc. v. David Randall Associates, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
- City Select Auto Sales, Inc. v. David/Randall Associates, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Wiegel v. Stork Craft Manufacturing, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Maxum Indemnity Co. v. Eclipse Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.