Legal Opinion

State ex rel. West Seattle Laundry Co. v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1922No. Nos. 17273, 17310PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolmah, J.

— Relator simultaneously made application here for writs of review in both of the above entitled actions.

It appears that the relator is a corporation long-engaged in the laundry business in the city of Seattle, and that among its principal assets is the good will of its customers situated upon its various established routes. One Graham entered its employ as a driver in 1916, was assigned to an established route known as route 4, and, at the time of such employment, entered into a written contract with relator, in and by which he covenanted that, for a period of six months after leaving…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Davis & Co v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. State ex rel. Marshall v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. State ex rel. Sprague v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. RemondSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Arneson v. DennyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1928
  3. Louisville N. R. Co. v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API