Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Remond
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 5, 1930No. 6 Div. 396PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
Marie Yeates recovered a judgment against N. W. Remond and Augusta Friedman’s Shop, Inc., for personal injuries. The judgment was affirmed on appeal of Augusta Friedman’s Shop, Inc. Friedman’s Shop v. Yeates, 216 Ala. 434, 113 So. 299.
The judgment remaining unsatisfied the original bill in this cause was filed by plaintiff against the defendants and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, the carrier of liability insurance in favor of N. W. Remond.
It was a statutory bill under Code, §§ 8376, 8377. The eqiiity of the original bill was challenged on the ground that N. W. Remond was sued…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- George v. Employers' Liability Assur. CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- Finkelberg v. Continental Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Miller v. Union Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- MacClure v. Accident & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. HannaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
- Shee v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1953
- Employers Ins. Co. of Alabama, Inc. v. BrockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- General Casualty & Surety Co. v. KiersteadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.