Legal Opinion

Wellington National Bank v. Thomson

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided November 20, 1899No. 701PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Sumner district court; J. A. Burnette, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Milton, J. :

This action was brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error and W. T. McBride and J. W. Haughey to recover upon a promissory note executed by them and delivered to the plaintiff, on June 11, 1888, the note being due four months after its date. It contained the following provision:

“We, the makers, sureties, guarantors and indorsers hereon, agree to extensions of this note without, notice, hereby ratifying such extensions, and binding ourselves for payment hereof as if no exten*668sion of time for or forbearance of payment…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Steele v. SouderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity, Plaintiff v. James H. Petersen, Henry Heidtbrink, and Jerry R. DunnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. Mark Rollinson, Edmund S. Barnett, United States of America v. Mark Rollinson, Edmund S. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  3. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. PetersenDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1983
  4. Fitzgerald v. BradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity, Plaintiff v. James H. Petersen, Henry Heidtbrink, and Jerry R. DunnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API