Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity, Plaintiff v. James H. Petersen, Henry Heidtbrink, and Jerry R. Dunn

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 6, 1985No. 83-2152Published

1Opinion of the Court

770 F.2d 141

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, in its corporate

capacity, Plaintiff- Appellant,

v.

James H. PETERSEN, Henry Heidtbrink, and Jerry R. Dunn,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 83-2152.

United States Court of Appeals,

Tenth Circuit.

Aug. 6, 1985.

Robert A. Zupkus of White & Steele, P.C., Denver, Colo. (Christopher Lane, Ellen W. Reath and Craig R. Maginness of Sherman & Howard, Denver, Colo., on the briefs), for plaintiff-appellant.

David C. Aspinwall of Burg, Aspinwall & Petrucci, P.C., Denver, Colo., for defendants-appellees.

Before BARRETT, BREITENSTEIN and TIMBERS*, Circuit Judges.

BREITENSTEI…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Juan Santoni, Jr. v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity, Plaintiff v. James H. Petersen, Henry Heidtbrink, and Jerry R. DunnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  5. Hayim Kalmich v. Karl BrunoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API