Legal Opinion

Roberts v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 28, 1983No. 14, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

The principal issue on this appeal from a rape conviction involves alleged error in the admission of evidence. A law enforcement officer was allowed to express the opinion that Shellcross Sniffer (Sniffer) had indicated that a cap known to have been worn by the rapist had been worn by the accused. Sniffer is a dog.

Gregory Bernard Roberts (Roberts or Petitioner) was convicted at a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Kent County of first degree rape, unlawfully wearing and carrying a dangerous weapon, daytime housebreaking and attempting to steal goods valued at less than $300.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. IversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Veney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  3. Cramer v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  5. Perry v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. KessingerKentucky Supreme Court · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Winfrey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  2. Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Winston v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  4. Markey v. WolfCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. Emory v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API