Winston v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE BROCK YATES, Justice.
A jury convicted appellant, Marcus Omar Winston, of burglary of a habitation and assessed punishment at six years’ confinement and a $2,000 fine. In two points of error, appellant challenges the trial court’s (1) denial of a motion under Texas Rule of Evidence 702 to exclude evidence of a scent lineup and (2) denial of appellant’s motion for directed verdict based upon the scent lineup evidence. We affirm.
Background and Procedural History
On May 18, 1999, the complainant’s son called to tell her their home had been burglarized. When she got home, she noticed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Nenno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- State v. TerrazasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Robinette v. BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- State v. RoscoeArizona Supreme Court · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Winfrey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- Ronald Curtis v. W. AnthonyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Trejos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
- State v. Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
- Richard Winfrey, Jr. v. San Jacinto CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.