Cramer v. Morrison
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAMURA, Acting P. J.
The central issue on this appeal is whether the results of an human leucocyte antigen (HLA) test are admissible to establish parentage in a civil paternity suit.
At the commencement of trial, defendant made an oral motion in limine to exclude the results of an HLA paternity test performed by Dr. Paul Terasaki of the UCLA School of Medicine on blood samples taken from the mother, the child and defendant. Defendant’s position was that given the existence of a valid scientific basis for the test and accepting Dr. Terasaki’s qualifications to perform it, the results were…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Davey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Moore v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Commonwealth v. BeausoleilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Turek v. HardySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.