Legal Opinion

Emory v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 29, 1994No. 1547, September Term, 1993PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MQYLAN, Judge.

The appellants, James Mitchell Emory and Roger Lee Emory, were convicted by an Anne Arundel County jury of nine and seven counts, respectively, charging drug kingpin conspiracy and related offenses. On this appeal, they contend:

1. that the trial court erred in admitting “other crimes” evidence;

2. that the evidence was not legally sufficient to sustain James Emory’s conviction for importation or Roger Emo ry’s conviction for possession with intent to distribute fifty pounds of marijuana;

3. that the trial court erred in denying the appellants’ motion to suppress physical evidence…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Wynn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. State v. LipkaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  3. Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. Silver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  5. Wynn v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API