Legal Opinion
J. F. Rowley Co. v. Rowley
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 15, 1927No. 3569PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
If it is not the last, this is the latest, dispute between members of the Rowley family in respect to making and selling artificial legs. For the litigious history of this long conflict, in so far as it is reported, we refer to J. F. Rowley Co. v. Rowley (C. C.) 154 F. 744; Rowley v. J. F. Rowley Co. (C. C. A.) 161 F. 94; and particularly to J. F. Rowley Co. v. Rowley and Rowley v. J. F. Rowley Co. (C. C. A.) 18 F.(2d) 700, this day decided. For the genesis of the instant controversy we refer to the statement of facts made in our opinion in the case last cited.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morgan Envelope Co. v. Albany Perforated Wrapping Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- J. F. Rowley Co. v. RowleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927
- J. E. Hanger. Inc. v. J. F. Rowley Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1924
- Rousso v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1921
- Rowley v. J. F. Rowley Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brooks Bros. v. Brooks Clothing of California, Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 1945
- International Election Systems Corp. v. ShoupDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Security Materials Co. v. Mixermobile Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1947