Legal Opinion
International Election Systems Corp. v. Shoup
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 24, 1978No. Civ. A. 73-756PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
FULLÁM, District Judge.
Plaintiff and defendants are competitors engaged in the business of selling and servicing voting machines and accessory parts therefor. On March 30, 1973, plaintiff, International Election Systems Corporation (IES), instituted this action alleging that defendant Ransom F. Shoup had fraudulently entered into a contract with Computer Election Systems, Inc., an exclusive sales agent for IES, with the intent to defraud plaintiff and with the intent to compete with plaintiff; and that defendants had infringed United States Letters Patent Nos. 2,953,296,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Morgan's Home Equipment Corp. v. MartucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- United States v. Univis Lens Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Deepsouth Packing Co. v. Laitram Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Taco Cabana International, Inc. v. Two Pesos, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- SI Handling Systems, Inc. v. HeisleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- RJM Sales & Marketing, Inc. v. Banfi Products Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1982
- Henry Hope X-Ray Products, Inc. v. Marron Carrel, Inc., an Arizona Corporation and Karl UngarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- G.D. Searle & Co. v. Hudson Pharmaceutical Corporation, G.D. Searle & Co., in No. 82-5600. Hudson Pharmaceutical Corp., in No. 82-5621Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.