Legal Opinion

J. E. Hanger. Inc. v. J. F. Rowley Co.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 7, 1924No. 4012PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

This is an infringement suit, involving patent No. 961,165, issued to appellee, Rowley, June 14, 1910, for an “artificial limb suspender and back check.” The trial court found claims Nos. 2, 3, 6, 8, 9, 11, and 12 valid and infringed by the appellant corporation.

In his specification Rowley says:

“The main objects of this invention are to provide an artificial limb and suspender embodying the invention described in my patent No. 644,464, but in which the connection between the suspender and the leg section, whereby the latter is moved on its knee joint, is made through…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Consolidated Fruit-Jar Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Computing Scale Co. of America v. Automatic Scale Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. Duplex Phonograph Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1909
  5. J. F. Rowley Co. v. Columbus Pharmacal Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents v. Thomas J. AllenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  2. Chicopee Manufacturing Corp. v. Columbus Fiber Mills Co.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1958
  3. J. F. Rowley Co. v. RowleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927
  4. Imperial Brass Mfg. Co. v. Bonney Forge & Tool Works, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. J. F. Rowley Co. v. Chester B. Winn, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API