Legal Opinion

Rowley v. J. F. Rowley Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 1, 1908No. 44PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania.

1Opinion of the Court

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

The appellee was complainant and the appellant was respondent in a suit in equity to restrain unfair competition in the manufacture and sale of artificial legs. The case was heard upon pleadings and proofs, and thereupon the decree now appealed from was entered, as follows:

“And now, November 13, 3907, this cause came on to be heard and was argued by counsel, and thereupon, upon consideration thereof, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that a perpetual injunction be granted in this cause against the said defendant, his agent, employés, servants, or by any one acting in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. June Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Hygienic Fleeced Underwear Co. v. WayCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1905

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sheffield-King Milling Co. v. Sheffield Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  2. J. F. Rowley Co. v. RowleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927
  3. J. F. Rowley Co. v. RowleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1912
  4. J. F. Rowley Co. v. RowleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API