Legal Opinion
Sastrom v. Psychiatric Security Review Board
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 28, 2009No. 17908, 17909PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROGERS, C. J.
In these certified appeals, we must determine whether the Superior Court has subject matter jurisdiction to decide the appeals brought by the plaintiffs, Roy Sastrom and Guy Levine, 1 from the declaratory rulings by the defendant, the psychiatric security review board (board), in which the board concluded that § 17a-581-44 of the Regulations of Connecti cut State Agencies 2 is valid because it does not conflict with General Statutes § 17a-599. 3 The Appellate Court concluded that the board’s rulings are not among the final decisions that may be appealed to the Superior…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Town of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Briggs v. State Employees Retirement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Testa v. GeressySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In Re Matthew F.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. McCoySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- Costantino v. SkolnickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Foley v. State Elections Enforcement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. Sunrise Herbal Remedies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.