Legal Opinion

Tremont v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 25, 1929No. 27,096PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olsen, C.

Appeal by defendant from an order denying its motion for a new trial.

Plaintiff purchased an automobile, paying down part of the purchase price and agreeing to pay the balance in monthly instalments. The usual contract was entered into, reserving title in the seller and providing that on default in any payment the seller had the right to retake the car and resell it at public or private sale, with or without notice to the buyer, retain out of the price received on such resale the expense of retaking, repairs, and resale, and a reasonable attorney’s fee, and apply the balance on the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dimond v. ManheimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  2. King v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  3. Jeffries v. PankowOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. McDonald v. BayhaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  5. Elwood v. SaterlieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. MacKayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  2. Zweig v. SchwartzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Timmer v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Penchoff v. Walter E. Heller Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. Baker v. JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API