McDonald v. Bayha
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for St. Louis county to recover $4,512.92 . for the conversion of household furniture. The case was tried before Cant, J., who found in favor of defendants. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.
This is an action to recover upwards of $4,000 of household furniture. The complaint alleged the ownership and right to possession by the plaintiff, and a conversion by defendants. The answer was a general denial. Upon the issue thus joined the cause was tried to the court, who found that the allegation of conversion of plaintiff’s property by defendants was not proved, and ordered judgment for them. There was a motion for a new trial, which was overruled. Plaintiff appeals.
It appears from the evidence that plaintiff, having occasion to furnish a home in Minneapolis, recently completed by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hossfeldt v. DillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Coleman v. PearceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Hammond v. DikeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Elwood v. SaterlieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Lehmann v. ChapelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- TCI Business Capital, Inc. v. Five Star American Die Casting, LLC, Brian T. FlynnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Carroll v. PrattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Steller v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Interstate National Bank v. McCormickMontana Supreme Court · 1923
- McDonald v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.