Legal Opinion

Penchoff v. Walter E. Heller Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 1, 1929No. 27,041PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action for conversion of an automobile. There was a verdict for the plaintiff for $800. The defendants appeal from an order denying their alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.

The plaintiff purchased an automobile from the Kelly Automobile Company, and the latter sold its interest in the contract of sale and the automobile to the defendant Walter E. Heller & Company. The defendant Bondy was the representative of the latter company engaged in liquidating its accounts. By the contract the time of payment was made the essence 'of the contract, and the plaintiff agreed “that the title to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holmes v. SchnedlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Tremont v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Fletcher v. LazierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. RussellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  2. C. I. T. Corporation v. CordsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. Stemland v. C. I. T. CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API