Legal Opinion
Zweig v. Schwartz
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 5, 1943No. 35PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Mrs. Helen Sacchino went to the jewelry store of Charles Schwartz & Son, the ap-pellees herein, and, representing herself to be Mrs. Evelyn Kent, obtained from ap-pellees under a conditional bill of sale a lady’s diamond ring. The sale price of the ring was $400, payable in weekly instal-ments of $5. The conditional sale agreement was executed by Mrs. Sacchino who signed her name as Evelyn Kent. Mrs. Kent is the sister of Mrs. Sacchino.
Sometime thereafter Mrs. Sacchino delivered the ring to her husband in order that he might obtain money on it with which to pay their…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Harkness v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Bryant v. Swofford Bros. Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Phelps v. . McQuadeNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Levi v. BoothCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- District of Columbia v. Hamilton Nat. Bank of WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
- Consolidated Goldacres Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
- Gasque v. SaidmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
- Bowles v. MarshDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
- Levy v. BryceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.