Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Hamill
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 28, 1986No. Civ. 11072PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
The Johnsons (lessors) appealed from a district court judgment dismissing their action against the defendants (hereinafter re*56ferred to as either Terra or the lessees) for cancellation of an oil and gas lease. We affirm.
Raymond and Elna Johnson own the surface and mineral estates in the following land, comprising 678.32 acres in Divide County:
Township 161 North, Range 102 West Section 19: NWV*
Township 161 North, Range 103 West Section 24: SEV.iSWVí, SWV4SEV4
Section 25: WV2NEV4, SEV4NWV4, NWV4 SEV4, NttNWVi
Section 26: NEVi, NWy4SEV4
Richard and Clifford Johnson own…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Doss Oil Royalty Co. v. Texas CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Johnson Ex Rel. Johnson v. American Motors Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Sauder v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Byron v. Gerring Industries, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Doyle v. SprynczynatykNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. SkjonsbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Ridl v. EP Operating Ltd. PartnershipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Serhienko v. KikerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Hieb v. JelinekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.