Legal Opinion

Townsend v. Creekmore-Rooney Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 27, 1960No. 38855PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

The parties, who appear here in the same relative position as they appeared in the trial court, will be referred to as they appeared in said court or by name.

On March 29, 1950, plaintiffs, L. D. and Alma Townsend, granted to defendants, Creekmore-Rooney Company, an oil and gas lease covering the E/2 of the NE/4 and the NW/4 of the NE/4, Sec. 5, T. 13N, R. E, Lincoln County, Oklahoma. This lease is referred to by the parties as the “Myrtle Townsend” Lease and in referring to said lease herein we will use said reference. The lease provided that same should “remain in force for a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strange v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. McVicker v. Horn, Robinson & NathanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  3. State Ex Rel. Commissioners of the Land Office v. Carter Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  4. Cotner v. WarrenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. Townsend v. Creekmore-Rooney CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Feland v. Placid Oil CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Durkee v. HazanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  3. Harding v. CameronDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1963
  4. Gazin v. Pan American Petroleum CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  5. Hunter v. ClarksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API