Legal Opinion

Anthony v. Crocker First National Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 7, 1928No. Docket No. 6577PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff commenced this action to recover from the defendant the sum of $2,320. Defendant denied the alleged indebtedness and by way of cross-complaint prayed judgment against plaintiff in the sum of $500. The court denied plaintiff any relief and gave judgment for the defendant in accordance with the prayer of its cross-complaint. From said judgment the plaintiff appeals.

In support of his cause of action the plaintiff, Lee Anthony, testified that on the fifteenth day of June, 1926, he called at defendant’s banking house in San Francisco and asked Charles Pratt, Jr.,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. MalloySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. National Gold Bank & Trust Co. v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Ocean Park Bank v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tahoe National Bank v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. FeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Pao Ch'en Lee v. GREGORICUCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Keigley v. Bench, City RecorderUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Pagano v. United Jersey BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API