Legal Opinion

Ocean Park Bank v. Rogers

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 21, 1907No. Civ. No. 319PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. N. P. Conrey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Appeal from judgment and order denying motion for new trial

The defendant, Lora 0. Rogers, and one A. B. Widney each kept a general deposit account with the plaintiff, which was a corporation engaged in a general banking business at the city of Ocean Park, of which city said Rogers was a resident. About July 19, 1905, and while the accounts of both said Rogers and Widney were overdrawn, Widney in due course of business drew his check upon said bank for the sum of $1,000, payable to the order of Rogers, who immediately went to the bank and, after indorsing the check, entered the amount thereof,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Oddie v. . the Nat. City Bank of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. National Gold Bank & Trust Co. v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Montgomery County v. CochranCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1903

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cohen v. First National Bank of NogalesArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Plumas County Bank v. Bank of Rideout, Smith & Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Larrus v. First National Bank of San Mateo CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Uriola v. Twin Falls Bank & Trust Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Anthony v. Crocker First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API