Berthold v. Fox
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff, and by one Schulenbnrg, from an order of the district court for Washington county", Grosby, J., presiding, allowing an amendment of a judgment.
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover possession of a raft of logs, and obtained possession, pending suit, by means of the provisional remedy designated in the statute as claim and delivery, the undertaking required by law being executed by one Frederick Schulenburg. The defendants in their answer claimed a return of the property. A jury trial was had, resulting in a verdict as follows : “We, *52the jury, find for the defendants, and for the return of the raft taken by the plaintiff; and in case a return can not be had, we find the value of the said raft to be $2,700, and damages for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McCormick v. Wheeler, Mellick & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1864
- Bilansky v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1859
- Weed v. WeedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
- President, Directors, & Co. of the Mechanics' Bank v. MinthorneNew York Supreme Court · 1821
- Piper v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1866
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Kenning v. ReichelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Brown v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Sherman v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- Atwood v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- New England Furniture & Carpet Co. v. BryantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.