Kenning v. Reichel
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Walter Reiehel petitioned the district court for Waseca county for an order directing Florence Reiehel Kenning to show cause why the judgment in the matter of the adoption of Florence Reiehel Kenning should not be vacated. The court, Childress, J., vacated the judgment and granted leave to Walter Reiehel to appear and file objections to the. entry thereof. From the order vacating the judgment and order for judgment, Florence Reiehel Kenning appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
The appellant, on May 3, 1920, obtained an ex parte order for the entry 'of judgment nunc pro tunc in the district court of Waseca county in an adoption proceeding commenced in that court in 1886. The order was based on affidavits, from which it appeared that appellant’s age is 36 years; that Robert Reiehel and Mary, his wife, made application for leave to adopt her; that they were represented by attorneys; that the petition was heard at the October, 1886, term of the district court; that the petitioners were sworn as witnesses in their own behalf; that the original files in the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re WightSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Furgeson v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1888
- Van Matre v. SankeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Nugent v. PowellWyoming Supreme Court · 1893
- Parsons v. ParsonsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Jones v. GuyTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Cubley v. BarbeeTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- In Re Adoption of AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Greene v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Harper v. LindseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.