Legal Opinion
United States v. Apple
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided May 15, 1996No. 2:95 CR 83PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LOZANO, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant, Nathan Apple, on October 27, 1995. For the reasons set forth below, this motion is DENIED.
BACKGROUND
Defendant, Nathan Apple, is charged with bribing an employee of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (“IDEM”). The indictment states as follows: From February 4, 1991, through September 13, 1995, IDEM investigated property of A.S.K. Shredders, Inc. for possible violations of state civil and criminal statutes. The investigation focused at least in part on A.S.K.’s storage and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Frank Buttitta v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Juan Carlos Ocampo and Luis Alfonso EscobarCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. James J. Coyne, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Trudie P. WestmorelandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Albert Louis Lipscomb, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. McCormackDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- United States v. FerraraDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- United States v. Pitt-Des Moines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- United States v. BoenderDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.