Legal Opinion

United States v. Pitt-Des Moines, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 18, 1997No. 96 CR 513PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, District Judge.

The United States of America is prosecuting Defendant Pitt-Des Moines, Inc. for its alleged willful violations of two regulations promulgated under the Occupational Safety and Health Act (the “OSH Act”). Before the court are various motions to dismiss the indictment pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(b). For reasons set forth below, the court denies these motions.

Background

A federal grand jury, on August 19, 1996, indicted defendant on two counts of violating 29 U.S.C. § 666(e), which makes it a criminal…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Maynard v. CartwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Ginsberg v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. CaputoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
  2. Halliburton Energy Services v. State, Department of LaborAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. United States v. SegalDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
  4. United States v. HillDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2016
  5. United States v. HendersonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API