Legal Opinion

Frank Buttitta v. City of Chicago

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 15, 1993No. 92-3631PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

This case presents an issue of first impression requiring this court to construe Section 5-156 of the Illinois Pension Code. 40 ILCS 5/5-156. In 1986, Chicago police officer Frank Buttitta (“Buttitta”) suffered an ankle injury in the line of duty that caused him to go on disability leave. In 1989 and again in 1991, the Chicago Police Department (“Police Department”) refused to reinstate Buttitta to active duty despite the fact that on both occasions the Retirement Board of the Policeman’s Annuity and Benefit Fund (“Board”) had “returned [Buttitta] to active service,”…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. Vendetta Jackson v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  2. Cole v. Milwaukee Area Technical College DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  3. Dykes v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  4. Ralph Licari v. City of Chicago, Miriam Santos, Richard J. Jones, Walter K. Knorr and Charles R. Loftus, in Their Individual and Official CapacitiesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  5. William Hudson and Bishop Pamon v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API