Legal Opinion

United States v. McCormack

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided November 25, 1998No. Criminal 97-10168-NGPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GERTNER, District Judge.

This case raises the question of how far Congress has gone, and, under the Constitution, may go, to federalize crime — here, the crime of bribing a Malden Police Officer to ignore certain state offenses.

Kevin McCormack (“McCormack”) has been indicted for giving cash payments of $4,000 to a Malden police officer, Detective David Jordan (“Jordan”), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(2). While the Malden Police department receives federal funds, the alleged bribe had nothing whatever to do with those funds, or indeed, with any cognizable…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert SuarezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. Albert Louis Lipscomb, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. Daniel M. EdgarCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. Basim Omar SabriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. GarciaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API