Legal Opinion
Alpine Haven Property Owners Ass'n v. Deptula
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided June 4, 2003No. 02-035PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. Defendants Edward Deptula and Bertrand and Joseph Emmett, homeowners in the Alpine Haven development, appeal a summary judgment order to pay three years of overdue fees, plus interest and costs, for road maintenance and other services rendered by plaintiff Alpine Haven Property Owners Association, Inc. (the Association). Defendants argue that the trial court erred by (1) entering judgment against defendant Deptula in the full amount claimed based on the doctrine of collateral estoppel; (2) applying the Uniform Common Interest Ownership Act of 1994 (UCIOA), 27A V.S.A. §§ 1-101 to 4-120,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Trepanier v. Getting Organized, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- Poplaski v. LamphereSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- Springfield Hydroelectric Co. v. CoppSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- Berlin Convalescent Center, Inc. v. StonemanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- Sorge v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Scott v. City of NewportSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- In re P.J.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- In Re PJSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Will v. Mill Condominium Owners' Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- Daniels v. Elks Club of Hartford and the Human Rights CommissionSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.