Legal Opinion

Scott v. City of Newport

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 29, 2004No. 02-457PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Plaintiffs Richard Scott, Daniel Scott, and Bluffside Farms, Inc. (collectively, the Scotts) filed this action against defendant City of Newport, seeking a declaration that they are the owners of a 31-foot strip of land in the City, the traveled portion of which is known as Bigelow’s Bluff Road. The court granted summary judgment in favor of the City, ruling that the ownership issue had been conclusively determined against the Scotts in an earlier adjudication in which plaintiffs had challenged a site plan application by their neighbors the Carriers, the trial court had ruled that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re Glen M.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  2. Trepanier v. Getting Organized, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. Bull v. Pinkham Engineering Assocs., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  4. Mellin v. Flood Brook Union School DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  5. In Re Application of CarrierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In Re ArmitageSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  2. McAdams v. Town of BarnardSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  3. In re T.C.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  4. McAdams v. Town of BarnardSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  5. State v. Aita GurungSupreme Court of Vermont · 2025

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API