Legal Opinion
Poplaski v. Lamphere
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided August 4, 1989No. 87-479PublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of defendant International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). We affirm.
The facts stated by the trial court in its opinion are not in controversy. On the morning of March 25, 1984, plaintiff’s husband was the passenger in a car being driven by George W. Chesley, whose estate is a named defendant. While driving down Route 2A in the town of St. George, their car was struck by an automobile driven by defendant Mark Lamphere. Both Poplaski and Chesley died as a result of injuries sustained in the collision.
On the evening…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Otis Engineering Corp. v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Price v. LelandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Peck v. Counseling Service of Addison County, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1985
- Smith v. DaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Brueckner v. Norwich UniversitySupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Gallipo v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- Doe v. ForrestSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- Denis Bail Bonds, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Follo v. FlorindoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.