Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Elks Club of Hartford and the Human Rights Commission

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 3, 2012No. 2010-181PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

¶ 1. Plaintiff Richard Daniels is seeking foreclosure of a mortgage on two parcels of real property owned by defendant Elks Club of Hartford, Vermont (the Club). Defendant creditors, who include the Vermont Human Rights Commission (VHRC), four individual women, and the Watts Law Firm (Watts), all have junior security interests in the property at issue and oppose foreclosure. Creditors appeal from a trial court decision granting plaintiff’s motions for summary judgment, concluding that plaintiff has standing to foreclose and is entitled to a .judgment of foreclosure against all parties, and…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Marshall v. BaggettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  2. Martin v. CurranNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Trepanier v. Getting Organized, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  4. In Re Soon KwonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  5. Gramatan Home Investors Corp. v. StarlingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pannell v. ShannonKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. HemingwaySupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  3. Brownington Center Church v. Town of IrasburgSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  4. In re LowrySupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  5. In re LowrySupreme Court of Vermont · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API