Legal Opinion

State v. Acremant

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 2005No. CC995133C1; SC S44772PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, C. J.

This case is before us on automatic and direct review of defendant’s convictions for four counts of aggravated murder involving two victims and his sentences of death. See former ORS 163.150(1)(g) (1997), repealed by Or Laws 1999, ch 1055, § 1; ORAP 12.10 (providing for such review). Defendant asks this court to reverse his convictions and sentences of death or, alternatively, to vacate his sentences of death and remand for resentencing. We affirm the judgment of conviction and the sentences of death. Because the trial court erred by entering more than one aggravated murder conviction for…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. State v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. McAnultyOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. Avila-NavaOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. JamesOregon Supreme Court · 2005

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API