Legal Opinion

Carmell v. Texas

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 1, 2000No. 98-7540PublishedCited by 452 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

An amendment to a Texas statute that went into effect on September 1, 1993, authorized conviction of certain sexual offenses on the victim’s testimony alone. The previous statute required the victim’s testimony plus other corroborating evidence to convict the offender. The question presented is whether that amendment may be applied in a trial for offenses committed before the amendment’s effective date without violating the constitutional prohibition against state 11 ex post facto” laws.

I

In 1996, a Texas grand jury returned a 15-count indictment charging petitioner with various sexual…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  3. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by452 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Rose v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. FearsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Peugh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Rogers v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

447 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API