Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.
California Supreme Court
Application to the Supreme Court for a writ of prohibition to the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
This is an application by some of the defendants in the above-entitled action for a writ of prohibition or supersedeas to restrain the superior court *354from enforcing its judgment against them pending their appeal to this court. By the judgment appealed from, the plaintiff, Fox, recovered of the defendants, who are petitioning here, a little more than a million of dollars, and the amount of the undertaking necessary to stay proceedings pending the appeal is therefore in excess of two millions of dollars. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 942.) Such an undertaking in the proper amount—two million and…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Keefe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Lyders v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Bradshaw v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- State ex rel. Mutual Investment Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.