State ex rel. Mutual Investment Co. v. District Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota
The Mutual Investment Company and Alfred H. Hedderly presented an information in this court July 17, 1894, and obtained a writ of Certiorari to the District Court of Hennepin County, commanding that court to certify and return to this court on July 20 then next a transcript of all the records and proceedings had in that court in relation to the approval of an appeal bond and the justification of the sureties thereon, in an action wherein the Peoples Bank of Minneapolis was…
Read the full summary
The Mutual Investment Company and Alfred H. Hedderly presented an information in this court July 17, 1894, and obtained a writ of Certiorari to the District Court of Hennepin County, commanding that court to certify and return to this court on July 20 then next a transcript of all the records and proceedings had in that court in relation to the approval of an appeal bond and the justification of the sureties thereon, in an action wherein the Peoples Bank of Minneapolis was plaintiff and said relators defendants. The District Court by C. N. Dickey its clerk made return of a certified copy,…
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
Laws 1883, ch. 107, as amended by Laws 1885, ch. 3, § 7, provides that “it shall be lawful for any such trust company [annuity safe deposit and trust companies] to become the sole surety1 upon any bond or undertaking, for or on behalf of any person or persons or corporation in any suit, action or special proceeding in any court in this state where a bond or undertaking shall be necessary under the laws of this state or in any other matter, municipal or otherwise, where a bond or undertaking shall be required without any other bondsman or surety and without justification or qualification.”
Our…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McNamara v. PengillySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by2 opinions
- McNamara v. PengillySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- La Dow v. National BuildIng & Paying Brick Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909