Legal Opinion

Lyders v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1933No. Docket No. 8849PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The petitioner commenced a proceeding asking a writ of mandate directed to Department Four of the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the City and County of San Francisco- and the judge thereof, directing them to approve an undertaking theretofore tendered as a stay bond on appeal. The respondents answered and the parties have submitted a stipulation of facts.

Heretofore five different actions were commenced by Inger Marie Petersen et al. against Erie Lyders and judgment was obtained in the sum of $16,058.13. A motion to tax costs and a motion for a new trial were made but…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lake v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  3. San Francisco-Oakland Terminal Railways v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Central Holding Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Riesland v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  2. People v. Justice CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. State Ex Rel. Scott v. DobsonOregon Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API