People v. Odom
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Per curiam
In this attorney disciplinary proceeding, the respondent and assistant disciplinary counsel have entered into a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct. See C.R.C.P. 241.18. An inquiry panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee unanimously accepted the stipulation and agreement and recommended that the respondent receive a public censure. We accept the stipulation and agreement and the recommendation of the inquiry panel and order that the respondent be publicly censured and pay the costs of these proceedings. 1
I
The respondent was admitted to the bar of this court…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. RaderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- People v. BorchardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- People v. McDowellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- People v. ChewSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. OdomSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- People v. FarrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- People v. FritzeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- People v. OdomSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- People v. StevensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.