Legal Opinion

People v. Farry

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 16, 1996No. 95SA371PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel have entered into a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct. C.R.C.P. 241.18. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission, including the recommendation that the respondent be publicly censured. We accept the conditional admission and the inquiry panel’s recommendation.

I

The respondent was admitted to the Colorado bar in 1991. The conditional admission in this case details the highly complex facts that have given rise to this proceeding. We summarize only the most…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. OdomSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re WeierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  2. People v. FritzeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. People v. BuckinghamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. People v. CulterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  5. People v. FarrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API